http://opticality.disqus.com/enSat, 08 Nov 2008 10:35:38 -0000http://www.opticality.com/blog/2008/10/19/selling-the-presidency/#comment-3622709Well said Shannon. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!hadarSat, 08 Nov 2008 10:35:38 -0000http://www.opticality.com/blog/2008/10/19/selling-the-presidency/#comment-3621637I've never thought it made sense for candidates to create ads whose subject is their opponent. And, yes - I would support a law which forbids it.<br><br>What other industry flourishes on indirect ads, the way that politics does? Sure, there's the Mac and PC thing. But generally if a seller spends all his time pointing at the competition, the seller seems like a whiney complainer who doesn't have anything worthwhile to actually sell.iqwirtySat, 08 Nov 2008 08:19:02 -0000http://www.opticality.com/blog/2008/10/19/selling-the-presidency/#comment-3167215Interesting ideas.... I'm for curbing and limiting ad time rather than eliminating it...<br>certainly, we need to address the fact that the candidate and party w/ most money wins...<br>Bobbob MooneyMon, 20 Oct 2008 07:54:18 -0000http://www.opticality.com/blog/2008/10/19/selling-the-presidency/#comment-3159952I'm with you on this idea, Hadar. How great it would be to just hear what each candidate will do!SallySun, 19 Oct 2008 15:33:34 -0000